Permalink
Prev
Next
Return to results list
Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
Table Of Contents
Download Current Hansard 
View/Save XMLPrevious Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- CONDOLENCES
- QUESTIONS TO THE SPEAKER
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Trade: Import Risk Analysis
(Ripoll, Bernie, MP, Vaile, Mark, MP) -
Snowy Hydro Corporatisation
(Gash, Joanna, MP, Howard, John, MP) -
Workplace Relations
(Beazley, Kim, MP, Howard, John, MP) -
East Timor
(Tollner, David, MP, Downer, Alexander, MP) -
Workplace Relations
(Beazley, Kim, MP, Howard, John, MP) -
Economy
(Henry, Stuart, MP, Costello, Peter, MP) -
Workplace Relations
(Smith, Stephen, MP, Howard, John, MP) -
East Timor
(Lindsay, Peter, MP, Nelson, Dr Brendan, MP) -
Workplace Relations
(Macklin, Jenny, MP, Howard, John, MP) -
Budget 2006-07
(Vasta, Ross, MP, Costello, Peter, MP) -
Snowy Hydro Ltd
(Windsor, Antony, MP, Howard, John, MP) -
Indonesian Earthquake
(Moylan, Judi, MP, Downer, Alexander, MP) -
Skills Shortage
(Macklin, Jenny, MP, Hardgrave, Gary, MP) -
Influenza
(Keenan, Michael, MP, Abbott, Tony, MP) -
Oil for Food Program
(Rudd, Kevin, MP, Vaile, Mark, MP)
-
Trade: Import Risk Analysis
- QUESTIONS TO THE SPEAKER
- PERSONAL EXPLANATIONS
- DOCUMENTS
- PERSONAL EXPLANATIONS
- SNOWY HYDRO LTD
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- AUSTRALIAN TRADE COMMISSION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2006
- ROYAL COMMISSIONS AMENDMENT BILL 2006
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- NOTICES
-
Main Committee
- Start of Business
- STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS
-
APPROPRIATION BILL (NO. 1) 2006-2007
APPROPRIATION BILL (NO. 2) 2006-2007
APPROPRIATION (PARLIAMENTARY DEPARTMENTS) BILL (NO. 1) 2006-2007
APPROPRIATION BILL (NO. 5) 2005-2006
APPROPRIATION BILL (NO. 6) 2005-2006 - Adjournment
- QUESTIONS IN WRITING
Content Window
Tuesday, 30 May 2006
Page: 8
Page: 8
The SPEAKER (2:36 PM)
—The Manager of Opposition Business also asked whether a motion of closure of a member was valid in light of the terms in which it was moved. Given the withdrawals by the Leader of the House, the motion was a valid motion. I also note that the House endorsed the ruling by the Deputy Speaker to this effect, by negativing the motion of dissent from that ruling.