

Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
-
NATIVE TITLE AMENDMENT BILL 1997
- Consideration in Detail
- COOKED CHICKEN MEAT
- CHARTER OF BUDGET HONESTY BILL 1996
-
PUBLIC SERVICE BILL 1997
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT (CONSEQUENTIAL AND TRANSITIONAL) AMENDMENT BILL 1997 -
PARLIAMENTARY SERVICE BILL 1997
PARLIAMENTARY SERVICE (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 1997 - MINISTERIAL ARRANGEMENTS
- COOMBS, DR HERBERT COLE `NUGGET': DEATH
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Asian Financial Issues: World Stock Markets
(Mr BEAZLEY, Mr TIM FISCHER) -
Economy: Share Market
(Mr McDOUGALL, Mr COSTELLO) -
Glyphosate: Dumping
(Mr CREAN, Mr TRUSS) -
Telstra
(Mr HARDGRAVE, Mr FAHEY) -
BHP: Takeover
(Mr GARETH EVANS, Mr TIM FISCHER) -
Australian National Line
(Mr NEVILLE, Mr REITH) -
Tourism Industry
(Mr MARTIN, Mr ANDREW THOMSON) -
Taxation: Family Trusts
(Mr GARETH EVANS, Mr COSTELLO) -
Nursing Homes
(Mrs DRAPER, Mr WARWICK SMITH)
-
Asian Financial Issues: World Stock Markets
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Aged Care
(Mr ANDREN, Mr WARWICK SMITH) -
Australian Defence Force: Sexual Assault
(Mrs ELSON, Mrs BISHOP) -
Nursing Homes
(Ms MACKLIN, Mr WARWICK SMITH) -
Waterfront
(Mr PYNE, Mr REITH) -
Veterans: Nursing Homes
(Mr LAURIE FERGUSON, Mr BRUCE SCOTT) -
Veterans Entitlements
(Mr COBB, Mr BRUCE SCOTT) -
Veterans: Nursing Homes
(Mr LAURIE FERGUSON, Mr BRUCE SCOTT) -
Social Support Programs
(Mr WAKELIN, Mr RUDDOCK) -
War Crimes
(Mr HOLDING, Mr WILLIAMS) -
Home Affordability
(Mr RICHARD EVANS, Mr COSTELLO) -
Nursing Homes
(Ms MACKLIN, Mr WARWICK SMITH)
-
Aged Care
-
Questions on Notice
(Mr MOSSFIELD, Mr SPEAKER) - DEPARTMENT OF THE PARLIAMENTARY LIBRARY
- PAPERS
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- APPROPRIATION BILL (No. 3) 1997-98
- APPROPRIATION BILL (No. 4) 1997-98
- APPROPRIATION (PARLIAMENTARY DEPARTMENTS) BILL (No. 2) 1997-98
- TAXATION LAWS AMENDMENT BILL (No. 6) 1997
- MEDICARE LEVY AMENDMENT BILL (No. 2) 1997
- NATIVE TITLE AMENDMENT BILL 1996
- TAXATION LAWS AMENDMENT BILL (No. 4) 1997
-
NATIVE TITLE AMENDMENT BILL 1997
-
Consideration in Detail
- Mr WILLIAMS
- Mr MELHAM
- Mrs STONE
- Mr GARETH EVANS
- Mr TUCKEY
- Mr MAREK
- Mr GARETH EVANS
- Mr SLIPPER
- Mr STEPHEN SMITH
- Mrs GALLUS
- Mr CREAN
- Mr LIEBERMAN
- Mr MARTIN FERGUSON
- Mr KATTER
- Mr MELHAM
- Mrs STONE
- Mr CAMPBELL
- Mr SLIPPER
- Mr MELHAM
- Mr LIEBERMAN
- Mr GARETH EVANS
- Mr WILLIAMS
- Mr KELVIN THOMSON
- Mrs DE-ANNE KELLY
- Mr MELHAM
- Third Reading
-
Consideration in Detail
- DIVISION: RINGING OF BELLS
- CUSTOMS TARIFF AMENDMENT BILL (No. 5) 1997 [No. 2]
- EXCISE TARIFF AMENDMENT BILL (No. 5) 1997
- STATES GRANTS (GENERAL PURPOSES) AMENDMENT BILL (No. 2) 1997
- DEFENCE SERVICE HOMES AMENDMENT BILL 1997
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- NOTICES
- PAPERS
- Main Committee
- QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Page: 10074
Mrs ELSON
—My question is addressed to the Minister for Defence Industry, Science and Personnel. Minister, what are you doing about continuing claims of sexual assault and harassment in the Royal Australian Navy? Are appropriate structures in place to counter such alleged incidents?
Mrs BISHOP
—I thank the honourable member for her question. I know she, like I and other women on this side of the House, is concerned that young women are not deterred from having a career in the Australian defence forces. Reports of sexual harassment and sexual assault do indeed affect the decision of young women to seek a career in the Australian Defence Force.
Earlier this year I tabled the Burton and Quinn reports. As a result of the Burton report, we established an equity organisation designed to deal with this sort of problem. Despite the good work that is being done there, we are still continuing to have the sorts of reports that were in both the Bulletin and the Sun-Herald newspaper articles. There is sufficient concern that today there are terms of reference being settled by the personnel executive of the Defence Force, to be signed off by the CDF, which will enable an investigation to take place, particularly of behaviour at ADFA where a number of the reports emanate.
The important thing is that we want confidence to be restored. Accordingly, there will be contained in those terms of reference the need to identify and eradicate any incidents of repeating offences—that is, a single individual may be reported on one occasion but no action is desired by the complainant at that particular time; however, that person could offend again. That is totally unacceptable. The Defence Force has a policy that zero sexual harassment and sexual assault is acceptable. To achieve that, we need to continue to have a very strong backup situation whereby, even if the complainant says that she or he does not want any further action taken, it is neces sary that the offence is still formally reported in order that it can be dealt with.
With regard to sexual assault, it is necessary that civilian police forces be involved, that it is not dealt with simply by the Defence Force, in order that proper transparency is always available in the prosecution of those cases. That agreement has been reached. If a person is acquitted or fails to be convicted by a civilian court, there is available action for the Defence Force to take only if the DPP agrees to it. That also requires looking at because it is not always forthcoming in some instances I have seen where perhaps it should have been.
All those issues need to be looked at. But, at the end of the day, we must ensure that our policy is pursued rigorously, that zero is the acceptable level and that young women are not deterred from finding a very successful career in the Australian Defence Force.