

Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- PERSONAL EXPLANATIONS
- EXPORT MARKET DEVELOPMENT GRANTS BILL 1997
- EXPORT MARKET DEVELOPMENT GRANTS (REPEAL AND CONSEQUENTIAL PROVISIONS) BILL 1997
- AGED CARE INCOME TESTING BILL 1997
- AIDC SALE BILL 1997
- AUSTRALIAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION
-
HEARING SERVICES ADMINISTRATION BILL 1997
HEARING SERVICES AND AGHS REFORM BILL 1997 - HEARING SERVICES AND AGHS REFORM BILL 1997
-
RETIREMENT SAVINGS ACCOUNTS BILL 1996
RETIREMENT SAVINGS ACCOUNTS (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 1996
RETIREMENT SAVINGS ACCOUNTS SUPERVISORY LEVY BILL 1996 -
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Mid-Year Review
(Mr GARETH EVANS, Mr COSTELLO) -
Colston, Senator
(Mr NUGENT, Mr JULL) -
Social Welfare
(Ms HANSON, Mr HOWARD) -
Private Health Insurance
(Mr TUCKEY, Mr HOWARD) -
Department of Finance
(Mr DARGAVEL, Mr FAHEY) -
Australian Defence Industries
(Mr REID, Mr McLACHLAN) -
Unemployment
(Mr McMULLAN, Mr HOWARD) -
Rural Industry
(Mr COBB, Mr ANDERSON) -
Motor Vehicle Industry
(Mr BEAZLEY, Mr HOWARD) -
Flood Works Funds
(Mr BARTLETT, Mr SHARP) -
Sugar Industry
(Mr STEPHEN SMITH, Mr TIM FISCHER) -
Youth Suicide
(Mr SINCLAIR, Mrs MOYLAN) -
Staff: Senator Colston
(Mr GARETH EVANS, Mr HOWARD) -
Local Government Funding
(Mr ENTSCH, Mr WARWICK SMITH) -
Banking
(Mr KELVIN THOMSON, Mr COSTELLO) -
Thailand
(Mr NEVILLE, Mr TIM FISCHER) -
China: Refugees
(Mr KERR, Mr RUDDOCK) -
Gun Control: Funds
(Mr HARDGRAVE, Mr JULL) -
Shipbuilding
(Mr STEPHEN SMITH, Mr TIM FISCHER) -
Howard Ministry
(Dr SOUTHCOTT, Mr HOWARD) -
Hinchinbrook Development
(Dr LAWRENCE, Mr HOWARD)
-
Mid-Year Review
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL RESPONSES
-
Form of Questions
(Mr ALBANESE, Mr SPEAKER) -
Parliament House: Cleaning Services
(Mr McMULLAN, Mr SPEAKER) -
Questions on Notice
(Mr TANNER, Mr SPEAKER) - PERSONAL EXPLANATIONS
- RECORD
- PERSONAL EXPLANATIONS
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- COMMITTEES
- ASSENT TO BILLS
- COMMITTEES
- LAW AND JUSTICE LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 1996
- TRANS-TASMAN MUTUAL RECOGNITION BILL 1996
- VETERANS' AFFAIRS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (1996-97 BUDGET AND OTHER MEASURES) BILL 1996
- COMMONWEALTH SERVICES DELIVERY AGENCY BILL 1996
-
RETIREMENT SAVINGS ACCOUNTS BILL 1996
RETIREMENT SAVINGS ACCOUNTS (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 1996
RETIREMENT SAVINGS ACCOUNTS SUPERVISORY LEVY BILL 1996 - MATTERS REFERRED TO MAIN COMMITTEE
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- NOTICES
- PAPERS
- Main Committee
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Australian Securities Commission Investigators: Individuals Rights
(Mr Campbell, Mr Costello) -
Annual Budget Statements: Treasury Review
(Mr Latham, Mr Costello) -
ABC Television Reception: Perth
(Mr Filing, Mr Warwick Smith) -
Treasury: Expenditure on Hire Car Costs for Ministerial Travel
(Mr Laurie Ferguson, Mr Costello) -
Bradman Museum Foundation
(Dr Lawrence, Mr Warwick Smith) -
Treasury: Territories Expenditure
(Mrs Johnston, Mr Costello)
-
Australian Securities Commission Investigators: Individuals Rights
Page: 1576
Mr REID
—My question is addressed to the Minister for Defence.
Mr Crean
—What about the art gallery, Bruce?
Mr SPEAKER
—I warn the member for Hotham.
Mr REID
—Can the minister advise the House whether there has been any change in the government's attitude towards the privatisation of Australian Defence Industries?
Mr McLACHLAN
—I thank the member for Bendigo for his question. He has displayed a close interest in ADI for many years.
Like the previous government, we have been watching with interest the performance of Australian Defence Industries and we have noticed, with cautious optimism, that they now appear to be doing well. Indeed, the board has advised the government that its business restructuring has now put it in a position where privatisation could be a viable option. I might say that the coalition had no plans for the privatisation of ADI at the time of the last election. The Prime Minister said as much when he visited Bendigo in February last year, as did the member for Bendigo. At that time, ADI was still in the process of rationalisation of its business operations, which it set in train in 1989.
There is now widespread recognition within the industry of the improved operating performance of the company. Considerable interest has developed and they have done very well. The government is not averse to such a course, as neither was the previous government. No responsible government would categorically rule out for all time the privatisation of a public enterprise like this. Labor didn't nor will we. So we agree and, therefore, it is now clear that the company is successfully transforming itself into a viable commercial entity. Accordingly, we will be looking at the optimum time for its transition into private hands and I imagine that that will be in the next year or so.