

Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS
- GRIEVANCE DEBATE
- COMMITTEES
- APPROPRIATION BILL (No. 1) 1996-97
- CHILD CARE LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 1996
- COMMITTEES
- STATUTE LAW REVISION BILL 1996
- ASSENT TO BILLS
- PRIVATE MEMBERS BUSINESS
- SOCIAL SECURITY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (BUDGET AND OTHER MEASURES) BILL 1996
- MINISTERIAL ARRANGEMENTS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Skase, Mr Christopher
(Mr CADMAN, Mr HOWARD) -
Assistant Treasurer
(Mr GARETH EVANS, Mr COSTELLO) -
Psychiatric Consultations
(Mr BROUGH, Dr WOOLDRIDGE) -
Assistant Treasurer
(Mr BEAZLEY, Mr HOWARD) -
Economy
(Mr NEHL, Mr TIM FISCHER) -
Assistant Treasurer
(Mr BEAZLEY, Mr HOWARD) -
Outsourcing of Information Technology
(Mr NUGENT, Mr FAHEY) -
Assistant Treasurer
(Mr CREAN, Mr HOWARD) -
Nuclear Disarmament
(Mr ANTHONY, Mr DOWNER) -
Assistant Treasurer
(Mr BEAZLEY, Mr HOWARD) -
Papua Fruit Fly Infestation
(Mr ENTSCH, Mr ANDERSON) -
National Gun Control Advertising Contract
(Mr BEAZLEY, Mr HOWARD) -
Essendon Airport
(Mr HAWKER, Mr SHARP) -
Child Support
(Ms HANSON, Mr COSTELLO) -
Defence Force: Membership
(Mr RICHARD EVANS, Mrs BISHOP) -
National Gun Control Advertising Contract
(Mr MELHAM, Mr WILLIAMS) -
Veterans
(Mr BILLSON, Mr BRUCE SCOTT)
-
Skase, Mr Christopher
- PRIME MINISTER
- PAPERS
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- URGENT LEGISLATION
- APPROPRIATION BILL (No. 1) 1996-97
- APPROPRIATION BILL (No. 2) 1996-97
- APPROPRIATION (PARLIAMENTARY DEPARTMENTS) BILL 1996-97
- BUSINESS
- Adjournment
- PAPERS
- Main Committee
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Consultations with Minister for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission
(Mr Melham, Mr Williams) -
Venice Architecture Biennale: Australian Pavilion
(Dr Lawrence, Mr Warwick Smith) -
Financial Assistance: Employer Organisations and Industrial Companies
(Mr Martin Ferguson, Mr Tim Fischer) -
Government and Non-government School Funding
(Mr Lee, Dr Kemp) -
Department of Social Security: Redundancies
(Mrs Crosio, Mr Ruddock) -
Computer Systems Modifications
(Mr Martyn Evans, Mr Fahey) -
Kinetic Technology International
(Mr Tanner, Mr Sharp) -
Australian Defence Force Units: Electoral Division of Barton
(Mr McClelland, Mrs Bishop) -
Department of Social Security Offices
(Mr Fitzgibbon, Mr Ruddock) -
Public Libraries Electronic Access
(Mr Stephen Smith, Mr Warwick Smith) -
ABC Promotions
(Mr Barry Jones, Mr Warwick Smith) -
International Labour Conference, Geneva
(Mr Martin Ferguson, Mr Reith) -
Public Libraries Electronic Access
(Mr Latham, Mr Warwick Smith) -
Australian Electoral Commission: Trade Union Elections
(Mr Hawker, Mr Jull) -
Australian Government Analytical Laboratories
(Mr Pyne, Mr Jull) -
British Citizens: Voting Rights
(Mr Pyne, Mr Jull) -
Ministerial Overseas Visits
(Mr Laurie Ferguson, Mr Anderson) -
Ministerial Overseas Visit
(Mr Laurie Ferguson, Mr Warwick Smith) -
Ministerial Overseas Visits
(Mr Laurie Ferguson, Mr Warwick Smith) -
Ministerial Overseas Visits
(Mr Laurie Ferguson, Mr Reith) -
Ministerial Overseas Visits
(Mr Laurie Ferguson, Mr Ruddock) -
Ministerial Overseas Visits
(Mr Laurie Ferguson, Mr McLachlan) -
Ministerial Overseas Visits
(Mr Laurie Ferguson, Mr Anderson) -
Ministerial Overseas Visits
(Mr Laurie Ferguson, Mr McGauran) -
Ministerial Overseas Visits
(Mr Laurie Ferguson, Mrs Bishop) -
Ministerial Overseas Visits
(Mr Laurie Ferguson, Mrs Moylan) -
Frequent Flyer Points
(Mr Laurie Ferguson, Mr Jull)
-
Consultations with Minister for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission
Page: 5217
Ms HANSON
—My question is addressed to the Treasurer. Will the government address the social and financial problems incurred with child support? If the government supports sole parents with an income of approximately $47 per week per child, how can it justify non-custodial parents having to pay in excess of $100 per week per child, leaving these people in destitute situations, even throwing in their jobs to obtain better financial security on the dole?
Mr COSTELLO
—The reason why the government policy is to seek a contribution from non-custodial parents under child support is that the government believes that both parents are responsible for the children that they bring into the world, whether they have custody of them or not. The reality is that if the parents are not going to be made to make a contribution it is only going to be other taxpayers who will be picking up the difference.
As a matter of policy, our government believes that the parents are the first area of responsibility and that there should be mechanisms for the parents to make a contribution. Where the parents are unable to do so, of course there is a social security net which steps in for the sake of the children. I believe that no humane society could have it otherwise.
Non-custodial parents cannot believe that they lose responsibility for the maintenance and rearing of children once they lose custody. I think we all recognise that family breakdown is a terrible thing and to be avoided as far as possible. But where it does occur, both parents, whether custodial or non-custodial, have a responsibility which is firstly owed to the children—
Mr Price interjecting—
Mr COSTELLO
—I would not interject here if I were you.
Mr Fitzgibbon interjecting—
Mr SPEAKER
—The member for Chifley and the member for Hunter.
Mr COSTELLO
—The member for Hunter thinks this is a bad situation, does he? You do not think that non-custodial parents should make a contribution? We are very interested to see the interjections that are coming from the Labor backbench because the Labor frontbench agrees with this position. That is why there is absolute silence down there, old son.
We believe that the non-custodial parents should be making a contribution because it is in the interests of the children concerned and in the interests of preserving their prospects in a humane and decent society.