Save Search

Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
  

Previous Fragment    Next Fragment
Wednesday, 8 May 1996
Page: 615


Mr FAHEY (Minister for Finance)(4.31 p.m.) —I move:

That the bill be now read a second time.

This bill is a machinery financing measure to enable certain defence expenditures to be met from the loan fund rather than the consolidated revenue fund and to supplement the moneys available to the consolidated revenue fund.

Legally, expenditure from the consolidated revenue fund cannot exceed the moneys available to that fund. Successive governments have adopted the practice of introducing a loan bill to authorise the issue of moneys from the loan fund to meet expenditures that have been appropriated by the parliament, but for which insufficient funds are available in the consolidated revenue fund.

The purpose of this bill is to make provision for the financing of the prospective deficit in the consolidated revenue fund. The difference between the estimated budget and consolidated revenue fund outcomes, estimated at about $2.8 billion in 1995-96, arises because appropriations from the CRF include various items which are functionally classified as financing transactions rather than outlays, and thus do not affect the budget outcome. These items include superannuation payments made by the Commonwealth on behalf of public trading enterprises.

The bill provides authority for the loan fund to meet defence expenditures incurred in 1996-97 after the passage of the bill that would otherwise have been met from the consolidated revenue fund and, if necessary, to reimburse the consolidated revenue fund for certain non-defence expenditures. The bill also provides the authority to raise loans to cover these payments from the loan fund.

Except for loan raising expenses, which are currently estimated at $0.2 million for 1996-97, the bill does not authorise expenditures additional to those already approved by, or currently before, the parliament. I emphasise that the bill does not in any way impinge on the prerogative of the parliament to appropriate moneys, but simply provides the means to finance expenditures previously approved and appropriated by the parliament. I present the explanatory memorandum to the bill.

Debate (on motion by Mr Kerr) adjourned.