

Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- MOTIONS
- BILLS
- DELEGATION REPORTS
-
BILLS
- Road Safety Remuneration Bill 2011
- Road Safety Remuneration (Consequential Amendments and Related Provisions) Bill 2011
- Stronger Futures in the Northern Territory Bill 2011
- Stronger Futures in the Northern Territory (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2011
- Crimes Legislation Amendment (Powers and Offences) Bill 2011
- Customs Amendment (Anti-dumping Improvements) Bill (No. 2) 2011
- Access to Justice (Federal Jurisdiction) Amendment Bill 2011
- Nuclear Terrorism Legislation Amendment Bill 2011
- Antarctic Treaty (Environment Protection) Amendment Bill 2011
- Social Security Legislation Amendment Bill 2011
- Australian Research Council Amendment Bill 2011
- Excise Amendment (Reducing Business Compliance Burden) Bill 2011
- Customs Amendment (Reducing Business Compliance Burden) Bill 2011
- Insurance Contracts Amendment Bill 2011
- Tax Laws Amendment (2011 Measures No. 9) Bill 2011
- Electoral and Referendum Amendment (Maintaining Address) Bill 2011
- Illegal Logging Prohibition Bill 2011
- National Health Amendment (Fifth Community Pharmacy Agreement Initiatives) Bill 2011
- Personally Controlled Electronic Health Records Bill 2011
- Personally Controlled Electronic Health Records (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2011
- COMMITTEES
-
BILLS
- Aviation Transport Security Amendment (Air Cargo) Bill 2011
- Broadcasting Services Amendment (Review of Future Uses of Broadcasting Services Bands Spectrum) Bill 2011
- Coal Mining Industry (Long Service Leave) Legislation Amendment Bill 2011
- Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Amendment (Significant Incident Directions) Bill 2011
- Business Names Registration (Application of Consequential Amendments) Bill 2011
- Crimes Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2011, Veterans' Affairs Legislation Amendment (Participants in British Nuclear Tests) Bill 2011, Protection of the Sea (Prevention of Pollution from Ships) Amendment (Oils in the Antarctic Area) Bill 2011
- Stronger Futures in the Northern Territory Bill 2011
- Social Security Legislation Amendment (Family Participation Measures) Bill 2011
- STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
- MOTIONS
- QUESTIONS TO THE SPEAKER
- PERSONAL EXPLANATIONS
- AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORTS
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- COMMITTEES
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- PRIVILEGE
- BILLS
-
ADJOURNMENT
- Slipper, Peter, MP
- Petition: Australian Broadcasting Corporation
- Petition: Australian Broadcasting Corporation
- Petition: Importation of Primates
- Berowra Electorate: Pennant Hills Road
- Mobile Phone Services
- Mining
- Jones, Mr Barry
- Solomon Electorate
- Gillard Government
- Mining
- Education
- Uranium Exports
- Western Australia: Goods and Services Tax
- NOTICES
-
Main Committee
- Start of Business
-
CONSTITUENCY STATEMENTS
- Queensland
- Hindmarsh Electorate: Glenelg Historical Society
- Farrer Electorate
- Makin Electorate: Concept2Creation
- Marriage Celebrants
- Lyne Electorate: Employment
- Dawson Electorate: Carbon Tax Ballot
- Fremantle Electorate: Perth 2011
- Solomon Electorate: Dementia
- Cancer Council: Redcliffe Relay for Life
- BILLS
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- ADJOURNMENT
- QUESTIONS IN WRITING
Page: 13734
Mr HAYES (Fowler) (12:44): In September and October this year I took the opportunity to visit a number of law enforcement jurisdictions overseas as part of my study leave entitlement, and I would like to table a copy of my study leave report, which I would like to speak to. In applying for my study leave to the Special Minister of State I mentioned the inquiry that was currently underway by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Law Enforcement. As chair of that committee, I saw an opportunity to further extend some of the information gathering in respect to the inquiry by undertaking the study leave. I asked every member of the law enforcement committee, as well as the Joint Committee on Law Enforcement Integrity, if they were able to join me. I was also directly approached by the Australian Crime Commission and the Australian Federal Police to form a delegation to travel overseas. Mrs Kim Ulrick from the Australian Crime Commission and Commander Ian McCartney of the Australian Federal Police joined with me in my visit to the UK, Ireland, Italy and France to gain a better understanding of how relevant agencies in these jurisdictions deal with proceeds of crime matters and also the recovery of unexplained wealth from serious and organised criminals.
The objectives of the delegation were to consider ways to improve existing unexplained wealth legislation and arrangements in order to maximise the opportunity to counter serious and organised crime in Australia in light of international best practice. The visit reinforced the need for the Australian government to vigorously pursue stronger unexplained wealth legislation and demonstrated that the direction Australia has started to take in this respect has been the right one. As you are aware, Madam Deputy Speaker, organised crime is about money. The cost of organised crime to the Australian community is estimated at up to $15 billion annually, with around $6 billion going offshore each year. Making organised criminals account for their criminal and unexplained wealth is the major focus of the inquiry undertaken by the Joint Committee on Law Enforcement and is therefore considered a vital tool for law enforcement agencies in Australia to disrupt and dismantle organised criminal organisations.
It is clear from the organisations and jurisdictions visited by the Australian delegation that the most effective way to attack organised crime is to attack criminal profits. Many of the organisations visited by the delegation, such as the Serious and Organised Crime Agency in the UK, City of London Police, Derbyshire Constabulary, the Department for Home Office and the Metropolitan Police, cited examples where organised criminals would go to great lengths, including opting for jail time, to avoid relinquishing their assets, criminal profits and consequently their lifestyle. Globally, contemporary methods of policing are focusing very much on unexplained wealth as being a vehicle by which law enforcement can attack criminal organisations with a view to disrupting their businesses by making it more difficult to reinvest in criminal enterprise, and thus protecting the community from crime being recommitted.
While there have been moves towards requiring organised criminals to explain wealth that does not match their legitimate earnings, many agencies visited by the delegation faced a range of challenges relating to this approach, including the need to link to a predicate offence or waiting for a conviction to be recorded before being able to apply for unexplained wealth to be explained to a court.
In the limited time I have available I would like to thank all those people who helped to make this a valuable opportunity for the law enforcement committee and myself, particularly Mrs Kim Ulrick, Commander Ian McCartney, AFP liaison officers Kieran Miller and Ric Cummins, the AFP's Jonathan Eyres at Interpol and Sue Spencer from the AFP Canberra office, who did a fantastic job in coordinating my visit and making sure that we gained significant evidence to present to my committee. (Time expired)