- Title
SELECT COMMITTEE ON THE REFORM OF THE AUSTRALIAN FEDERATION
09/03/2011
Relations between federal, state and local governments
- Database
Senate Committees
- Date
09-03-2011
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
42
- Committee Name
SELECT COMMITTEE ON THE REFORM OF THE AUSTRALIAN FEDERATION
- Page
- Place
Perth
- Questioner
- Reference
Relations between federal, state and local governments
- Responder
- Status
Final
- System Id
committees/commsen/13649/0000
Next Fragment
-
SELECT COMMITTEE ON THE REFORM OF THE AUSTRALIAN FEDERATION
(Senate-Wednesday, 9 March 2011)-
Senator FURNER
SCHEGGIA, Mr Wayne
CHAIR
Senator BACK
Mr Scheggia
Senator MOORE -
Senator FURNER
CHAIR
Mr Murray
Senator BACK
MURRAY, Mr Andrew
Senator MOORE -
NEWMAN, Mr Mark
CHAIR
Senator BACK
Mr Newman
Senator MOORE -
Mrs Burges
CHAIR
BURGES, Mrs Rebekah
Senator BACK
Senator MOORE -
Senator BACK
Mrs Finlay
ZIMMERMANN, Dr Augusto
Senator MOORE
CHAIR
Dr Zimmermann
Dr Zimmerman
FINLAY, Mrs Lorraine
Ms Finlay -
PHILLIPS, Dr Harry
CHAIR
Senator BACK
Dr Phillips
Senator MOORE -
Mr Henderson
CHAIR
HASSELL, Mr Tony
Mr Hassell
Senator BACK
HENDERSON, Mr Rodney Keith
Senator MOORE
-
Senator FURNER
Senate committee
Wednesday, 9 March 2011
Relations between federal, state and local governments
Final
CHAIR (Senator Trood) —I declare open this public hearing of the Senate Select Committee on the Reform of the Australian Federation, the third in the series of public hearings the committee is holding to inform its inquiry. The committee is to report by 12 May 2011. I welcome you all here today.
I remind everybody that witnesses giving evidence to the committee are protected by parliamentary privilege. Any act which may disadvantage a witness on account of their evidence is a breach of privilege and maybe treated by the parliament as a contempt. It is also a contempt to give false and misleading evidence to a committee. Witnesses should be aware that if in the giving of evidence they make adverse comment about another individual or organisation, that individual or organisation will be made aware of the comment and given reasonable opportunity to respond to the committee.
The committee prefers to hear evidence in public but we may agree to take evidence confidentially. The committee may still publish confidential evidence at a later date but we would consult the witnesses concerned before doing this.
[10.02 am]

