Senator SPICER (Victoria) (AttorneyGeneral) . - At the second-reading stage, clause 11 was discussed, and I then said that some of the wording of subclause (4.) was ambiguous, and that it might well be that if it were strictly construed it could destroy the operative effects of the clause itself. In almost any case in which a House of Parliament might have power to disallow an acquisition, the exception would be in a case in which sub-clause (4.) could be brought into operation. In those circumstances, speaking for myself, I am not disposed to oppose the amendment which Senator Wright has moved. As for his reference to the Regulations and Ordinances Committee, I have not examined the relative Standing Orders recently, but at one time I was chairman of that committee and these matters were examined. My recollection is that unless some one makes a complaint, it is difficult for the committee to act. The honorable senator's suggestion is worthy of consideration, and if it involved an amendment of the Standing Orders, that could be dealt with during the next session of Parliament.

Amendment agreed to.

Clause, as amended, agreed to.

Clauses 12 to 24 - by leave - taken together and agreed to.

New heading and clauses 24a and 24b.