- Title
BILLS
Deterring People Smuggling Bill 2011
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
25-11-2011
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
- Page
9700
- Party
AG
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Hanson-Young, Sen Sarah
- Stage
Deterring People Smuggling Bill 2011
- Type
- Context
BILLS
- System Id
chamber/hansards/d9650329-cf28-42c6-a98f-270778227bf3/0105
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
-
BILLS
-
Competition and Consumer Legislation Amendment Bill 2011
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Sherry, Sen Nick
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Sherry, Sen Nick
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Sherry, Sen Nick
- Ryan, Sen Scott
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Sherry, Sen Nick
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Sherry, Sen Nick
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Sherry, Sen Nick
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Ryan, Sen Scott
- Sherry, Sen Nick
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Madigan, Sen John
- Division
- Third Reading
- Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Bill 2010, Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) (Consequential Provisions) Bill 2010
- Third Reading
- Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2011, Social Security Amendment (Student Income Support Reforms) Bill 2011
- Third Reading
-
Deterring People Smuggling Bill 2011
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Hanson-Young, Sen Sarah
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Hanson-Young, Sen Sarah
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Bernardi, Sen Cory
- Hanson-Young, Sen Sarah
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Hanson-Young, Sen Sarah
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Hanson-Young, Sen Sarah
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Hanson-Young, Sen Sarah
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Hanson-Young, Sen Sarah
- Ronaldson, Sen Michael
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Third Reading
-
Competition and Consumer Legislation Amendment Bill 2011
- PRIVILEGE
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
-
COMMITTEES
- Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity Committee
- Education, Employment and Workplace Relations References Committee
- Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee
- Economics References Committee
- Publications Joint Committee
- Economics Legislation Committee
- Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee
- Public Accounts and Audit Committee
- DELEGATION REPORTS
-
COMMITTEES
- National Broadband Network Committee
- Community Affairs Legislation Committee, Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee, Rural Affairs and Transport Legislation Committee, Rural Affairs and Transport References Committee
- Community Affairs References Committee
- National Capital and External Territories Committee
- Economics Legislation Committee
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- PARLIAMENTARY REPRESENTATION
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Australian Bureau of Statistics (Question No. 686)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Finance and Deregulation (Question No. 1103)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Finance and Deregulation: Staffing (Question No. 1124)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Special Minister of State: Staffing (Question No. 1149)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Climate Change and Energy Efficiency (Question No. 1179)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Charitable Organisations (Question No. 1222)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Climate Change and Energy Efficiency (Question No. 1223)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (Question No. 1266)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Carbon Pricing (Question No. 1269)
(Macdonald, Sen Ian, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Austrade (Question No. 1280)
(Milne, Sen Christine, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (Question No. 1281)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Mr Assange, Julian (Question No. 1282)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (Question No. 1286)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Conroy, Sen Stephen)
-
Australian Bureau of Statistics (Question No. 686)
Page: 9700
Senator HANSON-YOUNG (South Australia) (15:45): I would like to make it very clear for the sake of Hansard, and to anybody listening, that the government have consistently failed to show that there is anything in the current legislation that has acted as a deterrent. This bill is named the Deterring People Smuggling Bill, yet the government cannot provide any evidence that the current act and criminal charges within the Migration Act have deterred anybody, because the figures have not gone down since 2010. In fact they have increased. No-one has been deterred under this legislation because it does not target the right people. The people it targets are the scapegoats for this government's getting tough on people smugglers. It is an absolute farce. The government want the Australian people to believe they are doing something, but they are doing absolutely nothing except punishing vulnerable, impoverished Indonesian fishermen and children. Where is the Labor Party's moral compass on this issue?
The reason the opposition are voting for this legislation is that this is the type of legislation Tony Abbott is proud of. That is why they are voting for it; not because they are doing the right thing and not because they are doing anything that tackles the issue. If Tony Abbott had thought of it, he would have.
I can see that I am not going to get anywhere with getting responses to the genuine questions I have. The whole point of this legislation is not to deliver any substance in relation to the issues being dealt with—and why the court case in Victoria is currently happening; it is all about scuttling the case. It absolutely is a breach of the separation of powers. It will open up the case for further litigation at the cost of Australian taxpayers, and it is all for show and spin. It is so that this government can go home tonight and say, 'Yep, we fought off at least one court case this year.'
I do not have any other questions for the minister because I do not think he has any answers. The government have no idea what they were doing with this bill, except pushing it through so that they do not have to fight their case in the courts. It is an absolute disgrace to be abusing our court system in that way.

