- Title
TRADE PRACTICES AMENDMENT (COUNTRY OF ORIGIN REPRESENTATIONS) BILL 1998
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
03-07-1998
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
38
- Electorate
TAS
- Interjector
- Page
4899
- Party
AG
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Brown, Sen Bob
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
Bills
- System Id
chamber/hansards/1998-07-03/0133
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
-
TELEVISION BROADCASTING SERVICES (DIGITAL CONVERSION) BILL 1998
DATACASTING CHARGE (IMPOSITION) BILL 1998-
In Committee
- Bourne, Sen Vicki
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Bourne, Sen Vicki
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Bourne, Sen Vicki
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Bourne, Sen Vicki
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Bourne, Sen Vicki
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Bourne, Sen Vicki
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Bourne, Sen Vicki
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Bourne, Sen Vicki
- Adoption of Report
- Third Reading
-
In Committee
- COMMITTEES
-
TRADE PRACTICES AMENDMENT (COUNTRY OF ORIGIN REPRESENTATIONS) BILL 1998
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Woodley, Sen John
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Woodley, Sen John
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Hogg, Sen John
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Hogg, Sen John
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Hogg, Sen John
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Hogg, Sen John
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Hogg, Sen John
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Hogg, Sen John
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Hogg, Sen John
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Woodley, Sen John
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Woodley, Sen John
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Woodley, Sen John
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Woodley, Sen John
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Hogg, Sen John
- Woodley, Sen John
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Mackay, Sen Sue
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
Page: 4899
Senator BROWN (3:28 PM)
—I cannot swallow that argument from the Labor Party. This Democrat amendment goes a substantial way towards improving the legislation, which will allow all manner of food goods with ingredients imported into this country, to be sold under `Made in Australia' labelling. Senator Woodley's amendment raises the bar from 50 per cent to 75 per cent. That is an excellent thing. It is not as strong as the Greens' amendment, which I failed to get through here a short while ago, but it is an excellent step in the right direction.
I say to Labor that it is not good enough to have consumers waiting on the prospect of a return to a Labor government. Now is the opportunity to improve consumer protection through this amendment and we should be taking it. It stands on its own merits. To simply say that it allows for two classifications, one for food and one for other manufactured products, and that that is not a good thing, is not an argument that can be carried through.
This will improve the labelling when shoppers are buying food. It will mean that many more products that get the `Made in Australia' label, or a better proportion of them, will have dinkum Australian ingredients in them. That is the test. That is why this amendment should be supported.

