- Title
TRADE PRACTICES AMENDMENT (COUNTRY OF ORIGIN REPRESENTATIONS) BILL 1998
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
03-07-1998
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
38
- Electorate
NSW
- Interjector
- Page
4898
- Party
ALP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Neal, Sen Belinda
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
Bills
- System Id
chamber/hansards/1998-07-03/0132
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
-
TELEVISION BROADCASTING SERVICES (DIGITAL CONVERSION) BILL 1998
DATACASTING CHARGE (IMPOSITION) BILL 1998-
In Committee
- Bourne, Sen Vicki
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Bourne, Sen Vicki
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Bourne, Sen Vicki
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Bourne, Sen Vicki
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Bourne, Sen Vicki
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Bourne, Sen Vicki
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Bourne, Sen Vicki
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Alston, Sen Richard
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Bourne, Sen Vicki
- Adoption of Report
- Third Reading
-
In Committee
- COMMITTEES
-
TRADE PRACTICES AMENDMENT (COUNTRY OF ORIGIN REPRESENTATIONS) BILL 1998
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Woodley, Sen John
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Woodley, Sen John
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Hogg, Sen John
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Hogg, Sen John
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Hogg, Sen John
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Hogg, Sen John
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Hogg, Sen John
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Hogg, Sen John
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Hogg, Sen John
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Woodley, Sen John
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Woodley, Sen John
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Woodley, Sen John
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Woodley, Sen John
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Hogg, Sen John
- Woodley, Sen John
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Parer, Sen Warwick
- Mackay, Sen Sue
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
Page: 4898
Senator NEAL (3:26 PM)
—It certainly was true that there were
particular concerns raised in relation to food products, both at the hearing and in discussions that the opposition has had with various consumer groups. The very obvious producers who are affected are concentrated orange juice manufacturers, pork producers and strawberry growers. All those people, who are largely primary producers, raised a concern that, by allowing an item to be labelled `Australian Made' when it was only 50 per cent, could encourage our manufacturers to bring in that primary produce from overseas, particularly when it might be cheaper.
There are two matters that concern me. It is difficult when you are trying to get the simplest and most straightforward scheme in place to have different percentages applying to different products. To some extent it is almost as confusing for consumers to have different levels apply to different products, as the concern they might have about food produce.
Again, I understand the concerns, but I do not feel that to substantially amend some portion of the bill in an ad hoc way is appropriate, when there seems to be general dissatisfaction amongst consumers, and perhaps the bill at large is the appropriate way to go. Again, in any major monitoring and review of this scheme, we may need to amend this area, but at this stage we do not propose to support the Democrat amendment.

